Subject term search
Making FAIReR (FAIReR = FAIR + Responsible) researcher assessments possible - Final report of EOSC Co-Creation project published.
Public Consultation of DRAFT Vision on FAIReR Assessments is now open until 15 March.
To foster responsible evaluation of research and researchers, Europe needs a vision, roadmap and data infrastructures for creating FAIR research data as well as making the data about research activities and merits FA
Technician or a data collector working at a European institution, participate in a survey about how current academic assessment systems and infrastructures support evaluating open science practices.
What will the reforms mean for researchers when applying for Academy funding or using the funding granted? How are the Academy’s new practices linked to national and international developments in science and research?
EOSC Co-Creation project aims to a responsible and open future in reseacher assessment.
Research evaluation shapes and directs research. It is therefore important to consider how the researcher will be evaluated and what kind of research community will be created by the evaluation practices.
The evaluation of research should be based primarily on expert evaluation at unit and researcher level.
The Steering Group of the Publication Forum has updated the user guide for the Publication Forum classification. The user guide contains recommendations on the responsible use of the classification.