The outputs of the working groups have now been published in three languages. The three recommendations complement the policy of open scholarship and the previous recommendations.
Content
National recommendation
Implementation plan
International collaboration
Steering group
Responsible Assessment
The Recommendation for the responsible evaluation of a researcher in Finland provides guidance on how to carry out the researcher's
The themes of the event this year are knowledge ecosystems and liable evaluation. The seminar is intended for all people working with e.g. bibliometrics, research evaluation, and research administration.
Join DORA on Friday, February 11, 2022 for a one hour webinar to discuss how research assessment reform may be viewed as a systems problem, and how the application of systems thinking can be leveraged to overcome barriers to implementing reform.
To foster responsible evaluation of research and researchers, Europe needs a vision, roadmap and data infrastructures for creating FAIR research data as well as making the data about research activities and merits FA
What will the reforms mean for researchers when applying for Academy funding or using the funding granted? How are the Academy’s new practices linked to national and international developments in science and research?
Publication Forum evaluates domestic and foreign academic publication channels.
Level 1 includes peer-reviewed publication channels that are specialised in the publication of scientific research outcomes and have an editorial board of experts of the
Research evaluation shapes and directs research. It is therefore important to consider how the researcher will be evaluated and what kind of research community will be created by the evaluation practices.